Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
В Финляндии предупредили об опасном шаге ЕС против России09:28
，推荐阅读雷电模拟器官方版本下载获取更多信息
You can also enable auto-linking feature to automatically add affiliate links for certain keywords
Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone!，详情可参考Safew下载
Что думаешь? Оцени!。服务器推荐对此有专业解读
Waitrose said it was the first UK supermarket to suspend mackerel sales, adding it would only start selling the fish again once it met their "high sourcing standards".