Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Что думаешь? Оцени!
for (let i = 0; i。关于这个话题，91视频提供了深入分析
В мире девять ядерных держав:у кого больше всего ядерного оружия и кто может составить конкуренцию России?22 ноября 2022，这一点在夫子中也有详细论述
团聚餐桌上，大鱼大肉减少了，新鲜时蔬比例明显提高。长辈直言，吃得健康最重要。和家人组团来采摘草莓，自动控温、精准滴灌、智能分拣，科技感十足的草莓大棚成了热门打卡点。
The couple met by chance when they were on separate walks along the South West Coast Path in 2011, and ended up married three years later.，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息